The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English
نویسندگان
چکیده
While in (1a) and (1b) -ic and -ity, and -less and -ness happily combine, the combination -less-ity is impossible. Similar sets of examples can be found in abundance and pose the question what exactly is responsible for such patterns. Basically three types of answers have been given in the pertinent literature. One group of scholars argues for the existence of lexical strata (e.g. Siegel 1974, Allen 1978, Selkirk 1982, Kiparsky 1982, Mohanan 1986, Giegerich 1999) with strong restrictions holding between the different strata. This view is disputed, for example, in Fabb (1988) and Plag (1996, 1999), who claim that it is selectional restrictions of individual suffixes that are responsible for the combinatorial properties of suffixes. Finally, and most recently, Hay (2000) has proposed an attractive psycholinguistic
منابع مشابه
On the Interaction of Grammatical and Processing Restrictions in Derivational Morphology
There is a long-standing debate about the principles and mechanisms that constrain the combinatorial properties of affixes, in particular of English suffixes. One group of scholars argues for the existence of lexical strata with strong restrictions holding between the different strata. This view is disputed by scholars who claim that it is selectional restrictions of individual suffixes that ar...
متن کاملWhat constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology
There is a long-standing debate about the principles and mechanisms that constrain the combinatorial properties of affixes, in particular of English suffixes. One group of scholars argues for the existence of lexical strata with strong restrictions holding between the different strata. This view is disputed by scholars who claim that it is selectional restrictions of individual suffixes that ar...
متن کاملOn the Processing of Novel Root+suffix Combinations
New words are constantly entering language. When a new word is formed by the combination of existing morphemes, it is expected to follow languagespecific structural patterns called selectional restrictions. If a new word follows these restrictions, then it can be considered to be morphologically legal, and if it violates these restrictions, then it can be said to be morphologically illegal. For...
متن کاملOut of Order?: Russian Prefixes, Complexity-based Ordering and Acyclicity
There is a longstanding debate about how to appropriately model the combinability of affixes, especially English suffixes. One widely accepted principle is the notion of so-called selectional restrictions, i.e. grammatical requirements of particular affixes. For example, the suffix -ness can only combine with adjectival bases. Hay (2002) proposed a psycholinguistic approach to affix ordering no...
متن کاملA Method of Adding New Entries to a Valency Dictionary by Exploiting Existing Lexical Resources
Information on subcategorization and selectional restrictions in a valency dictionary is very important for natural language processing in tasks such as monolingual parsing, accurate rule-based machine translation and automatic summarization. However, adding this detailed information is both time consuming and costly. In this paper we present a method of assigning valency information and select...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001